TRAFALGAR SQUARE, LONDON – The big reveal of the annual Trafalgar Square Christmas tree—a long-standing symbol of Anglo-Norwegian goodwill—was unveiled to a chorus of groans and chuckles yesterday.

The Norwegian spruce, which journeyed thousands of miles from Oslo, has been likened by critics to “a festive coat rack” and “a particularly unlucky houseplant.” This year’s tree, with sparse branches and a noticeably lopsided profile, has quickly become the Scrooge of the season.

The tradition, now in its 77th year, commemorates the UK’s support of Norway during World War II. But what began as a touching gesture of gratitude has evolved into a beloved holiday tradition of public ridicule. By sundown, social media was ablaze with Londoners bemoaning the tree’s “Grinch-like vibe” and questioning whether Norway might be taking the piss.

Khan take it seriously

Mayor Sadiq Khan, who officiated the lighting ceremony, found himself in the crosshairs. Critics accused him of prioritizing other festivals over the Christian holiday, while others simply blamed him for the tree’s “underwhelming” aesthetic. “Looks like we’ve been gifted a stick with delusions of grandeur,” quipped one disgruntled Londoner.

Meanwhile, comparisons to other cities’ displays have added fuel to the fire. “New York has a Rockefeller masterpiece; we’ve got a glorified broom,” one comment read, as photos of Warsaw’s glittering decorations made the rounds online.

Still, some defended the scraggly spruce. “It’s the thought that counts,” said one optimistic observer, before being drowned out by a chorus of complaints.

As the tree prepares to endure weeks of public scrutiny, Londoners can at least take comfort in a dependable holiday tradition: uniting in mutual disdain for Trafalgar Square’s iconic, if questionable, centrepiece.

Meanwhile: Local woman manages to buy house in Southwold